On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 18:56 -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote: > On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 16:19 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > > > fwiw, I've been maintaining acpica recipe in meta-oe, and will keep an > > eye here as well. > > meta-luv supports both x86* and arm*, and we have an interest in > > having the same features available and working for qemuaarch64. > > I was not aware of this. Perhaps there is no need for us to maintain a > separate recipe in meta-luv.
Looks like there is consensus that maintaining an acpica recipe in OE-core is the right approach. I'll prepare a revision of this patch series that includes acpica instead of iasl and also addresses the other points that Ricardo raised. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
