On 15 Sep 2016 03:21, "Patrick Williams" <patr...@stwcx.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23:47PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > It was also proposed and discussed some 15 months ago and it was packaging > > issue not handling hardlinks correctly: > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-April/103939.html > > > > I believe this was fixed then, but maybe it got broken again? > > Sorry, this is my fault. I didn't think about hard-links. I was just > skimming the cpio extract for parts that could be trimmed out and > noticed it. > > $ ls -i *fsck* > 19455718 e2fsck > 19455671 fsck > 19455718 fsck.ext2 > 19455718 fsck.ext3 > 19455718 fsck.ext4 > 19455718 fsck.ext4dev > 19455679 fsck.minix > 19455695 fsck.minix.util-linux > 19455675 fsck.util-linux > > Is there a reason to prefer hardlinks over softlinks, for my own > education? My desktop system used softlinks for fsck.
Mine too. I don't really care, soft links are surely more obvious, though. A.
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
