On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23:47PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > It was also proposed and discussed some 15 months ago and it was packaging > issue not handling hardlinks correctly: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-April/103939.html > > I believe this was fixed then, but maybe it got broken again?
Sorry, this is my fault. I didn't think about hard-links. I was just
skimming the cpio extract for parts that could be trimmed out and
noticed it.
$ ls -i *fsck*
19455718 e2fsck
19455671 fsck
19455718 fsck.ext2
19455718 fsck.ext3
19455718 fsck.ext4
19455718 fsck.ext4dev
19455679 fsck.minix
19455695 fsck.minix.util-linux
19455675 fsck.util-linux
Is there a reason to prefer hardlinks over softlinks, for my own
education? My desktop system used softlinks for fsck.
--
Patrick Williams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
