On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 11:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On 17 May 2016 at 08:31, Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > There's not much to work on as far as I can tell: 1.11 should be > > > a > > > simple upgrade with trivial patch changes. > > > As I said, I'm totally fine with waiting a couple of weeks until > > > 1.11. > > > On the other hand I haven't seen any reasons to start packaging a > > > pre-release -- why this one if we normally don't do it? > > > > > > Agreed, if we want an upgrade now then 1.10 is good, otherwise wait > > for > > 1.11. There's no urgent need for a prerelease is there? > > So please do 1.10 now, as the XWayland rework was done basing on that > ... we can handle 1.11 upgrade once it happens.
I fixed up the selftest failure the original patch as proposed caused and have merged that. Anything further can be based on that... Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
