On 13 May 2016 at 23:15, Otavio Salvador <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Jussi Kukkonen > <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> wrote: >> Support for multiple new protocols, many new features: >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2016-February/027039.html >> >> Weston now depends on wayland-protocols (which is protocol >> collection split off from weston). >> >> Remove upstreamed patches, add a patch to fix the wayland-protocols >> path used during build. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen <jussi.kukko...@intel.com> > > I am working on rework the weston recipes and it seems Weston 1.11 is > close of release. I think instead of adding 1.10 we could use 1.10.91 > and upgrade it to 1.11.0 when it is out (end of May). This avoids > another cycle of rebase of patches during 2.2 development cycle. > > What do you think?
I don't have a burning need to get 1.10 in at all (I almost didn't send these in the first place because of 1.11 being just two weeks away). If you'd rather avoid the churn I'm fine with doing other things and looking at this again after 1.11 release. I'm also totally happy to keep my paws off this completely if your rework is going to include the 1.9 -> 1.11 upgrade in it. Here's my current 1.10 branch in case it's useful (the important change is the WAYLAND_PROTOCOLS_SYSROOT_DIR hack to get multilib working with allarch wayland-protocols): git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib jku/wayland-1.10 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=jku/wayland-1.10 Just to be clear: Based on this discussion I don't currently plan to send a V2 to list unless there's demand for it. Thanks, Jussi -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
