On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <de...@denix.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 26 April 2016 at 12:59, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> > I added a PACKAGECONFIG for libgbm to mesa.inc, enabled it for mesa and >> > disabled it for mesa-gl, and mesa-gl still build fine but didn't ship a >> > libgbm. >> > >> > I've forgotten the details about all of this: does mesa-gl shipping libgbm >> > make sense at all? Or in the real world will BSPs either use mesa or their >> > own GLES driver + their own libgbm + mesa-gl if required? >> > >> >> I've just sent a couple of mesa patches, can you see if these help? > > Thanks, making few builds now to test those. > > What about virtual/libgbm package and updating mesa's PROVIDES list?
I think it would make it even more flexible; I am in favor of it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
