On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 26 April 2016 at 12:59, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > > > I added a PACKAGECONFIG for libgbm to mesa.inc, enabled it for mesa and > > disabled it for mesa-gl, and mesa-gl still build fine but didn't ship a > > libgbm. > > > > I've forgotten the details about all of this: does mesa-gl shipping libgbm > > make sense at all? Or in the real world will BSPs either use mesa or their > > own GLES driver + their own libgbm + mesa-gl if required? > > > > I've just sent a couple of mesa patches, can you see if these help?
Thanks, making few builds now to test those. What about virtual/libgbm package and updating mesa's PROVIDES list? -- Denys -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
