On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
From: Ming Liu <peter.x....@external.atlascopco.com>
It makes no sense to install a initramfs bundled kernel image since
do_package does not depend on do_bundle_initramfs at all, otherwise, it
leads to a implicit kernel-image package depending on do_package run before
or after do_bundle_initramfs.
Again. So why not just add the ordering in the task dependencies ?
I'm probably missing something, which just means we need to tweak
the commit log a bit more.
The code you are removing is conditional, and is run after an
explicit kernel_do_compile is called, to rebuild the existing
kernel configuration with an embedded initramfs (via alternate initrd).
So outside of some ordering/parallel execution issues, I'm not seeing
it as broken.
Bruce
Signed-off-by: Ming Liu <peter.x....@external.atlascopco.com>
---
meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
index 4ce1611..d1ca614 100644
--- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
@@ -179,10 +179,6 @@ do_bundle_initramfs () {
kernel_do_compile
mv -f ${KERNEL_OUTPUT} ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}.initramfs
mv -f ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}.bak ${KERNEL_OUTPUT}
- # Update install area
- echo "There is kernel image bundled with initramfs:
${B}/${KERNEL_OUTPUT}.initramfs"
- install -m 0644 ${B}/${KERNEL_OUTPUT}.initramfs
${D}/boot/${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-initramfs-${MACHINE}.bin
- echo "${B}/${KERNEL_OUTPUT}.initramfs"
fi
}
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
