On 01/10/2016 06:52 PM, Roman Khimov wrote: > В письме от 10 января 2016 18:13:03 пользователь Matthias Schiffer написал: >> * I stand by my opinion that moving files automatically is a bad idea, > > But that's exactly what can make many of /usr merge changes automatically. > Take the kernel as an example, you just don't need the first two hunks of the > kernel.bbclass patch, fs-perms fixes that for you if it's told that /lib is a > symlink to 'usr/lib'.
I can see that it makes things simpler, but I'm more interested in a
correct solution than a simple one.
>
>> and the FILES issue mentioned in the other thread further backs my point
>
> IMO, FILES just shouldn't use hard-coded /lib or any other hard-coded path
> like that.
>
But if FILES depends on ${base_libdir} etc., the rest of the package
should also be adjusted to install all its files into ${base_libdir}
instead of /lib. Installing files to /lib, but putting ${base_libdir}
into FILES seems extremely broken to me.
Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
