On 01/04/2016 05:32 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 1/4/16 10:11 AM, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
>> On 01/04/2016 02:14 PM, Ian Ray wrote:
>>> The recipe uses hard-coded paths (specifically /lib) in do_install
>>> and in FILES, however on a merged /usr system this directory might
>>> not exist. Prefer base_libdir.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Ray <ian....@ge.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> This should use nonarch_base_libdir, base_libdir defaults to /lib64 on
>> ppc64, which is not where the firmware is expected.
>>
> 
> At a minimum, I would agree nonarch_base_libdir, however..
> 
> I believe that the kernel loader/modules/tools themselves actually have '/lib'
> hard coded into them.  This is the reason why /lib/firmware was used and not 
> one
> of the variables.
> 
> This is one of the cases were /lib is actually correct, since that is what the
> system is expecting.  We can make some kind of accommodation for systems where
> /lib -> /usr/lib... but that should be done inside of the filesystem setup
> processing and not the package itself.  (I'm referring to the
> 'meta/files/fs-perms.txt' file.
> 
> --Mark
> 

There seem to be some intresting ideas going around about what can or
should be done via fs-perms.txt... AFAICT, fs-perms.txt can't move
around files, so moving files form /lib to /usr/lib must be done in the
package recipes themselves. (In my opinion, fs-perms.txt is a bad hack
for broken recipes that shouldn't exist anyways, but that's another
discussion)

I think if a distro config changes any of the base paths
({nonarch_,}base_libdir, base_{,s}bindir), *all* packages should respect
this. It's the distro's reponsiblity to create symlinks so everything is
found again at the expected paths (other examples for such hardcoded
paths: /bin/sh; the dynamic linker). See also my patchset I submitted to
this mailing list, which introduces a distro feature to have such
symlinks created by base-files.

Matthias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to