On Wednesday 11 November 2015 13:34:57 Burton, Ross wrote: > On 11 November 2015 at 13:27, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> > > wrote: > > FWIW, I'd always thought "Rejected" would have been a more accurate label > > to > > use... on the other hand perhaps it's a bit late to be changing that now > > though. > > Agreed. We could change the guidelines to allow both but prefer Rejected?
That would work for me, we'd avoid issues of current values needing to be updated immediately at least... > Or is that too much effort when there's more important things to fix - this > could bikeshed easily. :) Hopefully this issue isn't too subjective ;) Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
