On 11 November 2015 at 13:27, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I'd always thought "Rejected" would have been a more accurate label > to > use... on the other hand perhaps it's a bit late to be changing that now > though. > Agreed. We could change the guidelines to allow both but prefer Rejected? Or is that too much effort when there's more important things to fix - this could bikeshed easily. :) Ross
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
