On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just a heads up for people that we've branched for release and that >> jethro branches are now available. Bitbake branched as 1.28, I decided >> to save bitbake 2.0 for another occasion. > > what would be the occasion ? > this time lets branch consistently. Across different repositories > please. I would also suggest to not use codenames in branches > but rather the numbered release. If we want to use codenames for > branches then lets drop the numbered release names.
I agree. The mix between codenames and version numbers cause a lot of confusion for outsiders. We, involved with the project development can handle it (even though sometimes I ask myself if one codename is older or newer than another) but for outsiders it is deadly confusing. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
