On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> update-rc.d.bbclass: explicitly dep on initscripts >> >> update-rc.d doesn't just want an initscripts package, it wants >> initscripts-functions. In the case where VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts is set >> to >> nothing, update-rc.d still needs initscripts-functions to satisfy its runtime >> dependencies. Further, we shouldn't be using a *runtime* virtual in a *build >> time* variable. This should resolve image creation failures with >> configurations without sysv initscripts when a recipe inherits update-rc.d >> and >> doesn't inherit systemd. >> >> (From OE-Core rev: e6642ae0849e5ac3174c643a7693af25d829d6d1) > > Unfortunately this means that I cannot PNBLACKLIST initscripts recipe in > DISTRO which provides own initscripts implementation (which also > provides initscripts-functions). > > What's even worse is that I'll have to overlay whole bbclass to get rid > of this dependency :/ >
would it help if initscript-functions was also PROVIDED by initscript replacement ? -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core