On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:48:19AM +0000, g...@git.openembedded.org wrote: > > Module: openembedded-core.git > > Branch: master > > Commit: 833302761df924bb503cc2ad04ecae1023381f8f > > URL: > http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=833302761df924bb503cc2ad04ecae1023381f8f > > > > Author: Christopher Larson <chris_lar...@mentor.com> > > Date: Mon Aug 24 15:18:34 2015 -0700 > > > > update-rc.d.bbclass: explicitly dep on initscripts > > > > update-rc.d doesn't just want an initscripts package, it wants > > initscripts-functions. In the case where VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts is > set to > > nothing, update-rc.d still needs initscripts-functions to satisfy its > runtime > > dependencies. Further, we shouldn't be using a *runtime* virtual in a > *build > > time* variable. This should resolve image creation failures with > > configurations without sysv initscripts when a recipe inherits > update-rc.d and > > doesn't inherit systemd. > > > > (From OE-Core rev: e6642ae0849e5ac3174c643a7693af25d829d6d1) > > Unfortunately this means that I cannot PNBLACKLIST initscripts recipe in > DISTRO which provides own initscripts implementation (which also > provides initscripts-functions). > > What's even worse is that I'll have to overlay whole bbclass to get rid > of this dependency :/ > Of course you can. This is a build dependency. Add a PROVIDES += "initscripts" + appropriate preferences. Alternatively, we could introduce a virtual/initscripts-functions. -- Christopher Larson kergoth at gmail dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
