On 03/08/2014 17:16, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 14:51 +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote: >> On 03/08/2014 14:25, Mike Looijmans wrote: >>> I'm getting lots of warnings like this: >>> >>> """ >>> WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-wirelesslan rdepends >>> on wireless-tools but its not a build dependency? [build-deps] >>> """ >>> >>> What does it actually mean? What does it want me to provide here? >>> >>> The message in itself is correct. The package only has a runtime >>> dependency. It does not require the wireless-tools package to be built >>> or otherwise present on the build system. But what is the QA issue >>> here and how do I get rid of the message? >>> >> Surely if package B has a non-optional runtime dependency on package A >> then package A must be built and present on the target ? > Its the "built" part that is the issue, bitbake can't see the > dependency, hence the warning. > >>> Apart from that, there's a spelling error in there (its -> it's) >>> because it's "it's" when it's "it is" and it's "its" when it's its >>> property. >>> >> It is a spelling error in a superficial sense perhaps, but at a deeper >> level I suspect it is more accurately characterised as a grammatical error. >> >> Perhaps somebody was having trouble with string terminations and decided >> to avoid trouble? > Somebody was concentrating on the correctness of the code generating the > warning rather than the grammar. The latter is easily fixed, patches > welcome. >
I stand corrected :) Cheers, Alex -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
