On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 14:51 +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote: > On 03/08/2014 14:25, Mike Looijmans wrote: > > I'm getting lots of warnings like this: > > > > """ > > WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-wirelesslan rdepends > > on wireless-tools but its not a build dependency? [build-deps] > > """ > > > > What does it actually mean? What does it want me to provide here? > > > > The message in itself is correct. The package only has a runtime > > dependency. It does not require the wireless-tools package to be built > > or otherwise present on the build system. But what is the QA issue > > here and how do I get rid of the message? > > > > Surely if package B has a non-optional runtime dependency on package A > then package A must be built and present on the target ?
Its the "built" part that is the issue, bitbake can't see the dependency, hence the warning. > > Apart from that, there's a spelling error in there (its -> it's) > > because it's "it's" when it's "it is" and it's "its" when it's its > > property. > > > > It is a spelling error in a superficial sense perhaps, but at a deeper > level I suspect it is more accurately characterised as a grammatical error. > > Perhaps somebody was having trouble with string terminations and decided > to avoid trouble? Somebody was concentrating on the correctness of the code generating the warning rather than the grammar. The latter is easily fixed, patches welcome. Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
