2014-04-27 11:52 skrev Koen Kooi:
Op 26 apr. 2014, om 20:39 heeft petter@technux.sehet volgende
geschreven:
2014-04-26 15:10 skrev Gary Thomas:
On 2014-04-25 16:11, Petter Mabäcker wrote:
The following changes since commit
c446d4edca3b4edfcdee48247391bfb306aab4c2: default-distrovars.inc:
Add libgcc-initial to the GPLv3 whitelist (same as libgcc)
(2014-04-25 18:00:38 +0100) are available in the git repository
at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib petmab/fix_xload
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=petmab/fix_xload
[1]
[1] Petter Mabäcker (2): x-load: fix broken beaglebone support
x-load: remove usage of FILESPATH
.../x-load/x-load-git/beagleboard/name.patch | 18 ----------
.../0001-Change-omap3530beagle-target-name.patch | 37
++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bb | 6
++--
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode
100644 meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load-git/beagleboard/name.patch
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load/beaglebone/0001-Change-omap3530beagle-target-name.patch
These changes don't seem quite correct since the beagleboard wasn't
renamed to be beaglebone - they are separate entities and there are
still beagleboard(s) out there (supported by meta-ti) At most, your
changes should simply add support for beaglebone, not remove
support
for beagleboard. --
------------------------------------------------------------ Gary
Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, Thanks for your input. Beagleboard is not longer supported in
YP.
See: Yocto Bug #2444, that results in for example: 9680453
yocto-project-qs: Substituting Beaglebone for Beagleboard. and
7254dfb
Drop beagleboard, replaced by beaglebone And usage of meta-ti layer
to
build beagleboard will override the x-load version within meta layer
(from oe) anyway
(seehttp://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/tree/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bb).
So my opinion is that it's correct to replace beagleboard with
beaglebone in this commit. But if you have any other opinion, please
let me know and I will of course consider them. Anyone else who have
any comments about this?
X-load shouldn't be used anymore, it has been superseded by u-boot
SPL
some years ago for all cortex based TI SoCs.
So we have another option here, that we should remove the recipe
completely from meta layer. Since possibly users probably are using
legacy boards together with meta-ti (that already has it's own version
of x-load), I guess it might be a possible way forward.
Anyone else with any comments about this? If no objections exists I
guess I can send up a new changeset that removes x-load instead,
otherwise I vote for go forward with this changeset until someone
decides that it's OK to remove x-load support.
/P
Links:
------
[1]
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=petmab/fix_xload
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
