Op 26 apr. 2014, om 20:39 heeft pet...@technux.se het volgende geschreven:
> 2014-04-26 15:10 skrev Gary Thomas: > >> On 2014-04-25 16:11, Petter Mabäcker wrote: >> >>> The following changes since commit >>> c446d4edca3b4edfcdee48247391bfb306aab4c2: default-distrovars.inc: Add >>> libgcc-initial to the GPLv3 whitelist (same as libgcc) (2014-04-25 >>> 18:00:38 +0100) are available in the git repository at: >>> git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib petmab/fix_xload >>> >> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=petmab/fix_xload >>> [1] Petter Mabäcker (2): x-load: fix broken beaglebone support x-load: >>> remove usage of FILESPATH .../x-load/x-load-git/beagleboard/name.patch >>> | 18 ---------- .../0001-Change-omap3530beagle-target-name.patch | 37 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bb | 6 ++-- 3 >>> files changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 >>> meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load-git/beagleboard/name.patch create mode >>> 100644 >>> >> > meta/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load/beaglebone/0001-Change-omap3530beagle-target-name.patch >> >> These changes don't seem quite correct since the beagleboard >> wasn't renamed to be beaglebone - they are separate entities >> and there are still beagleboard(s) out there (supported by >> meta-ti) >> >> At most, your changes should simply add support for beaglebone, >> not remove support for beagleboard. >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Gary Thomas | Consulting for the >> MLB Associates | Embedded world >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hi, > > Thanks for your input. Beagleboard is not longer supported in YP. See: Yocto > Bug #2444, that results in for example: > > 9680453 yocto-project-qs: Substituting Beaglebone for Beagleboard. > and > 7254dfb Drop beagleboard, replaced by beaglebone > > And usage of meta-ti layer to build beagleboard will override the x-load > version within meta layer (from oe) anyway > (seehttp://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/tree/recipes-bsp/x-load/x-load_git.bb). > So my opinion is that it's correct to replace beagleboard with beaglebone in > this commit. But if you have any other opinion, please let me know and I will > of course consider them. > > Anyone else who have any comments about this? X-load shouldn't be used anymore, it has been superseded by u-boot SPL some years ago for all cortex based TI SoCs. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core