On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote: > On 30 March 2014 05:17, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote: >>> On 26 March 2014 22:12, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: >>>> On 26 March 2014 22:04, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> There were interest in other threads in having musl as an alternative >>>>> to eglibc/uclibc that we already have in OE, in that direction I have >>>>> poured in my on and off work and put it into a contrib tree >>>> >>>> Blimey Khem that was quick. :) >>>> >>> >>> Agreed! >>> >>> I wonder if it's worth splitting this out into its own layer though >> >> I thought about it and since class/conf changes that need to go in into >> OE-core >> first I kept it as it is (lazyness too). I think once the core support >> is available in OE-core >> we can spin the recipes into a layer of its own. >> >>> (with fixes done via bbappends) so that it's easy for multiple people >>> to contribute to. It would also mean it doesn't need rebasing onto >>> master all the time. >>> >>> I'd definitely like to get involved with this. In particular I can >>> ensure opkg (both current release and development branch) work with >>> musl and see if some of my preferred software from meta-oe will build >>> (vim, htop, etc). >> >> start with what we have. Once master opens up I would propose the needed >> changes to OE-core and spin a layer >> > > I did a quick 'bitbake -k core-image-minimal' to see what's currently > failing. Full logs and config at > http://www.paulbarker.me.uk/musl-build/ > > Build Configuration: > BB_VERSION = "1.21.1" > BUILD_SYS = "x86_64-linux" > NATIVELSBSTRING = "Ubuntu-12.04" > TARGET_SYS = "arm-oe-linux-musleabi" > MACHINE = "qemuarm" > DISTRO = "nodistro" > DISTRO_VERSION = "nodistro.0" > TUNE_FEATURES = "armv5 thumb dsp" > TARGET_FPU = "soft" > meta = "kraj/musl:faafa7022ed057d55c131c456d1bdd5dfa3d2517" > > Summary: 6 tasks failed: > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-support/attr/attr_2.4.47.bb, do_compile > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python_2.7.3.bb, do_compile > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.24.1.bb, > do_compile > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/sysvinit/sysvinit_2.88dsf.bb, do_compile > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/busybox/busybox_1.22.1.bb, do_compile > openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_2.38.2.bb, do_compile > > I can see for util-linux that we need to implement qsort_r(). > > Busybox probably just needs config changes: > http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Building_Busybox
I already have local fix for busy box. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
