On 26 March 2014 22:12, Burton, Ross <ross.bur...@intel.com> wrote: > On 26 March 2014 22:04, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There were interest in other threads in having musl as an alternative >> to eglibc/uclibc that we already have in OE, in that direction I have >> poured in my on and off work and put it into a contrib tree > > Blimey Khem that was quick. :) >
Agreed! I wonder if it's worth splitting this out into its own layer though (with fixes done via bbappends) so that it's easy for multiple people to contribute to. It would also mean it doesn't need rebasing onto master all the time. I'd definitely like to get involved with this. In particular I can ensure opkg (both current release and development branch) work with musl and see if some of my preferred software from meta-oe will build (vim, htop, etc). Many thanks, -- Paul Barker Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk http://www.paulbarker.me.uk -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
