On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:15 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> When passing the wrong value for UBOOT_CONFIG it ought to raise an >> error otherwise it is quite difficult for user to notice it didn't >> behave as expected. >> >> Reported-by: Lauren Post <lauren.p...@freescale.com> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> >> --- >> meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass >> b/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass >> index ba01bff..ff226a1 100644 >> --- a/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass >> @@ -51,4 +51,9 @@ python () { >> if len(items) > 1 and items[1]: >> bb.debug(1, "Appending '%s' to IMAGE_FSTYPES." % items[1]) >> d.appendVar('IMAGE_FSTYPES', ' ' + items[1]) >> + >> + # Go out as we found a match! >> + break >> + else: >> + raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("UBOOT_CONFIG %s is not supported" % >> ubootconfig) >> } > > Shouldn't this be an exception such as ValueError rather than > SkipPackage?
Good point; I will send a v2 fixing this. Thanks for reviewing it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core