On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Richard Purdie
<richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 15:15 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> When passing the wrong value for UBOOT_CONFIG it ought to raise an
>> error otherwise it is quite difficult for user to notice it didn't
>> behave as expected.
>>
>> Reported-by: Lauren Post <lauren.p...@freescale.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br>
>> ---
>>  meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass 
>> b/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass
>> index ba01bff..ff226a1 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/uboot-config.bbclass
>> @@ -51,4 +51,9 @@ python () {
>>              if len(items) > 1 and items[1]:
>>                  bb.debug(1, "Appending '%s' to IMAGE_FSTYPES." % items[1])
>>                  d.appendVar('IMAGE_FSTYPES', ' ' + items[1])
>> +
>> +            # Go out as we found a match!
>> +            break
>> +    else:
>> +        raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("UBOOT_CONFIG %s is not supported" % 
>> ubootconfig)
>>  }
>
> Shouldn't this be an exception such as ValueError rather than
> SkipPackage?

Good point; I will send a v2 fixing this.

Thanks for reviewing it.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to