On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Chris Larson <clar...@kergoth.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Chris Larson <clar...@kergoth.com> wrote: >> ... >> > The standalone systemd-tmpfiles recipe I've created has a fairly small >> > set >> > of dependencies: intltool-native, dbus, libcap. Given this, I'd like to >> > propose transitioning away from populate-volatiles to systemd-tmpfiles, >> > even >> > for non-systemd images. I think that the update-tmpfiles shell script >> > may be >> > of use in a transition, but before we even begin discussing a transition >> > path, I'd like to request comments on the notion of moving to it at all. >> >> I think it shouldn't be hard to make an C app or script which could >> parse systemd-tmpfiles and use this for non-systemd systems. What do >> you think? > > > I considered this too, but systemd-tmpfiles supports quite a lot more than > volatiles, for example restoring selinux labels. Maybe that sounds fun to > you, but it sounded like more trouble than it was worth to me, given > systemd-tmpfiles can be used without systemd :) But yes, it's definitely > another option to consider.
-- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
