On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br>wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Chris Larson <clar...@kergoth.com> wrote: > ... > > The standalone systemd-tmpfiles recipe I've created has a fairly small > set > > of dependencies: intltool-native, dbus, libcap. Given this, I'd like to > > propose transitioning away from populate-volatiles to systemd-tmpfiles, > even > > for non-systemd images. I think that the update-tmpfiles shell script > may be > > of use in a transition, but before we even begin discussing a transition > > path, I'd like to request comments on the notion of moving to it at all. > > I think it shouldn't be hard to make an C app or script which could > parse systemd-tmpfiles and use this for non-systemd systems. What do > you think? > I considered this too, but systemd-tmpfiles supports quite a lot more than volatiles, for example restoring selinux labels. Maybe that sounds fun to you, but it sounded like more trouble than it was worth to me, given systemd-tmpfiles can be used without systemd :) But yes, it's definitely another option to consider. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
