On 20 June 2013 11:50, Paul Barker <p...@paulbarker.me.uk> wrote: > On 20 June 2013 11:25, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> On Thursday 20 June 2013 11:16:37 Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> To be honest I think ENTERPRISE_DISTRO needs to go. It's not even clear what >>> it should mean, and it's not consistently implemented. For things we want >>> to be optional we have PACKAGECONFIG; for items that have licensing >>> requirements that might be troublesome in certain deployments we have >>> LICENSE_FLAGS, and LICENSE_FLAGS >> >> Sorry, that should have read "and LICENSE_FLAGS already has a mechanism to >> prevent a recipe being built based on the current settings and report why." >> > > I decided to do a quick grep. "ENTERPRISE_DISTRO" isn't found at all > in openembedded-core, and in meta-openembedded it's just in the > following places, after I've converted mplayer2 to using PACKAGECONFIG > instead. >
That got trashed by word wrapping. It's these files: ./meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libsdl-mixer/libsdl-mixer_1.2.12.bb ./meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libav/libav.inc ./meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/vlc/vlc.inc ./meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/musicpd/mpd_0.17.1.bb ./meta-efl/recipes-efl/e17/enjoy_svn.bb > > So if we do want to get rid of this, it shouldn't be too much work. > -- Paul Barker Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk http://www.paulbarker.me.uk _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
