Op 9 apr. 2013, om 21:06 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 9 apr. 2013, om 19:46 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>>> On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini <koansoftw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> * Recipe taken from oe-classic >>>>> * Required by xinput-calibrator >>>> >>>> oe-core already ships not one but two terminal emulators, let's not >>>> add another one. Can we make this configurable in the recipe somehow >>>> and default to use matchbox-terminal (which is in the Sato images)? >>>> >>>> Long-term, alternatives along the lines of Debian's >>>> x-terminal-emulator is probably something we want. Then again I'm >>>> still not entirely sure why this is even spawning a terminal in the >>>> first place. >>> >>> u-a is not enough, we also need VIRTUAL-RUNTIME-x-terminal-emulator for >>> other recipes to RDEPENDS/RSUGGESTS/RRECOMMENDS on if they need some >>> terminal (and don't care which one will be used). >> >> Isn't this what xdg-utils are for? > > Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how xdg-utils will help > bitbake to find suitable runtime provider for "any-x-terminal-emulator". Ah, I thought you were after runtime resolving of that, sorry. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
