On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:01:21PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 9 apr. 2013, om 19:46 heeft Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > >> On 9 April 2013 15:21, Marco Cavallini <koansoftw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> * Recipe taken from oe-classic > >>> * Required by xinput-calibrator > >> > >> oe-core already ships not one but two terminal emulators, let's not > >> add another one. Can we make this configurable in the recipe somehow > >> and default to use matchbox-terminal (which is in the Sato images)? > >> > >> Long-term, alternatives along the lines of Debian's > >> x-terminal-emulator is probably something we want. Then again I'm > >> still not entirely sure why this is even spawning a terminal in the > >> first place. > > > > u-a is not enough, we also need VIRTUAL-RUNTIME-x-terminal-emulator for > > other recipes to RDEPENDS/RSUGGESTS/RRECOMMENDS on if they need some > > terminal (and don't care which one will be used). > > Isn't this what xdg-utils are for?
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how xdg-utils will help bitbake to find suitable runtime provider for "any-x-terminal-emulator". -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
