On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Paul Eggleton > <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>> libpcre \ >>> - portmap \ >>> rpcbind \ >>> sysfsutils \ >>> tcp-wrappers \ >> >> I came across this while digging back through the history in master. Does >> this >> mean we ought to be switching to rpcbind in our other tasks which currently >> bring in portmap (e.g. task-base-nfs, task-core-apps-console)? >> > > I guess yes because rpcbind is more featureful than portmap. its > better to use rpcbind as default portmapper. Things like ipv6, nfsv4
Yeah, I think that would be best. It is worth noting that task-base and portmap are in recipes-core, while rpcbind is, iirc, in recipes-support, so such a change would probably be best done when also swapping the locations of the two recipes. -- Christopher Larson _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
