On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> <bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield >> > <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> >> <bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Why is recipe renamed >> >>> >> >>> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to >> >>> 3.4.3 ? >> >> >> >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I >> >> noticed), about >> >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ... >> > >> > Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade >> > it when a new version appears :) >> >> I must have missed that .. because I'd disagree with both counts. >> >> - libc-headers does not need to be upgraded with every korg stable update >> - it is coupled to the kernel, and I've done it in the past, and had >> planned to >> leave it a 3.4. > > Bogdan: This is probably one of the cases we shouldn't automatically > update just based on the output of the version checking scripts. We > should only change the point release version here if there is a change > to the kernel headers that we need.
Understood, thanks. > > As for the recipe owner, this one may be best owned by Bruce but I'm > open minded on that. I have absolutely nothing against that. Thanks, Bogdan > > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
