On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 09:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
> <bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield
> > <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A
> >> <bogdan.a.marine...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Why is recipe renamed
> >>>
> >>> Wasn't I supposed to do that when I upgraded the package from 3.4 to 
> >>> 3.4.3 ?
> >>
> >> No one replied to my other question (or at least no one replied that I
> >> noticed), about
> >> why we even bothered to bump it to 3.4.3 ...
> >
> > Quite simply, I'm the owner of the recipe and I'm supposed to upgrade
> > it when a new version appears :)
> 
> I must have missed that .. because I'd disagree with both counts.
> 
>  - libc-headers does not need to be upgraded with every korg stable update
>  - it is coupled to the kernel, and I've done it in the past, and had planned 
> to
>    leave it a 3.4.

Bogdan: This is probably one of the cases we shouldn't automatically
update just based on the output of the version checking scripts. We
should only change the point release version here if there is a change
to the kernel headers that we need.

As for the recipe owner, this one may be best owned by Bruce but I'm
open minded on that.


Cheers,

Richard


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to