On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 09:08 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Richard Purdie > > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>> Richard/Saul, > >>> > >>> As Frans Meulenbroeks noted this morning, guilt wasn't functional > >>> in the devshell. The fix was simple enough, and by ensuring that > >>> GUILT_BASE is exported, it works without any extra steps now. > >>> > >>> I wasn't sure if there a better way to call 'up' to the base > >>> method, so I repeated the call to oe_terminal in the do_devshell() > >>> in kernel-yocto.bbclass. > >>> > >>> If there's another approach, let me know and I'll respin the patch. > >> > >> Can't you just set: > >> > >> GUILT_BASE = "meta" > > > > Will that export to the subshell ? I didn't try it .. since I didn't > > think it would. > > I'll give that a go here :) > > With just that set in kernel-yocto.bbclass, and I launch devshell, I get this: > > % guilt applied > Patches directory doesn't exist, try guilt-init > > So unless I misunderstood what you are suggesting, I still need that explicit > export.
Sorry, let me be more clear. I meant does: OE_TERMINAL_EXPORTS += "GUILT_BASE" GUILT_BASE = "meta" work? I'm not sure we need everything in the original patch... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
