On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:23 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> Richard/Saul, >>> >>> As Frans Meulenbroeks noted this morning, guilt wasn't functional >>> in the devshell. The fix was simple enough, and by ensuring that >>> GUILT_BASE is exported, it works without any extra steps now. >>> >>> I wasn't sure if there a better way to call 'up' to the base >>> method, so I repeated the call to oe_terminal in the do_devshell() >>> in kernel-yocto.bbclass. >>> >>> If there's another approach, let me know and I'll respin the patch. >> >> Can't you just set: >> >> GUILT_BASE = "meta" > > Will that export to the subshell ? I didn't try it .. since I didn't > think it would. > I'll give that a go here :)
With just that set in kernel-yocto.bbclass, and I launch devshell, I get this: % guilt applied Patches directory doesn't exist, try guilt-init So unless I misunderstood what you are suggesting, I still need that explicit export. Cheers, Bruce > > Bruce > >> >> ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end" -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
