On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 19:36 -0800, Khem Raj via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > ...e-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch | 87 +++++++++++++++++++ > meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb | 1 + > 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch > > diff --git > a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch > > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..88823cb95bc > --- /dev/null > +++ > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ > +From b662179d7c679e423b8595e0509253688544a4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > +Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 18:59:26 -0800 > +Subject: [PATCH] Revert "x86: Define __HAVE_FLOAT128 for Clang and use > + __builtin_*f128 code path" > + > +This reverts commit d773aff467840f5ed305e40c180466e90bd88183. > + > +Upstream-Status: Pending > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > +--- > + sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h | 24 ++++++++---------------- > + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > +
Why? Neither the commit message or the patch header have any information about why we need to do this... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#209559): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/209559 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110491482/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
