ignore this one patch please.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 7:36 PM Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> ---
> ...e-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
>
> diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
>
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..88823cb95bc
> --- /dev/null
> +++
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +From b662179d7c679e423b8595e0509253688544a4fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> +Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 18:59:26 -0800
> +Subject: [PATCH] Revert "x86: Define __HAVE_FLOAT128 for Clang and use
> + __builtin_*f128 code path"
> +
> +This reverts commit d773aff467840f5ed305e40c180466e90bd88183.
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
> +---
> + sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h | 24 ++++++++----------------
> + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h b/sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h
> +index ba030d270a..e661abaea4 100644
> +--- a/sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h
> ++++ b/sysdeps/x86/bits/floatn.h
> +@@ -28,8 +28,7 @@
> + support, for x86_64 and x86. */
> + #if (defined __x86_64__
> \
> + ? __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 3) \
> +- : (defined __GNU__ ? __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 5) : __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 4))) \
> +- || __glibc_clang_prereq (3, 4)
> ++ : (defined __GNU__ ? __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 5) : __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 4)))
> + # define __HAVE_FLOAT128 1
> + #else
> + # define __HAVE_FLOAT128 0
> +@@ -59,9 +58,7 @@
> + /* Defined to concatenate the literal suffix to be used with _Float128
> + types, if __HAVE_FLOAT128 is 1. */
> + # if __HAVE_FLOAT128
> +-# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) \
> +- || (defined __cplusplus && !__GNUC_PREREQ (13, 0)) \
> +- || defined __clang__
> ++# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || (defined __cplusplus && !__GNUC_PREREQ (13,
> 0))
> + /* The literal suffix f128 exists only since GCC 7.0. */
> + # define __f128(x) x##q
> + # else
> +@@ -71,9 +68,7 @@
> +
> + /* Defined to a complex binary128 type if __HAVE_FLOAT128 is 1. */
> + # if __HAVE_FLOAT128
> +-# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) \
> +- || (defined __cplusplus && !__GNUC_PREREQ (13, 0)) \
> +- || defined __clang__
> ++# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || (defined __cplusplus && !__GNUC_PREREQ (13,
> 0))
> + /* Add a typedef for older GCC compilers which don't natively support
> + _Complex _Float128. */
> + typedef _Complex float __cfloat128 __attribute__ ((__mode__ (__TC__)));
> +@@ -87,14 +82,12 @@ typedef _Complex float __cfloat128 __attribute__
> ((__mode__ (__TC__)));
> + # if __HAVE_FLOAT128
> +
> + /* The type _Float128 exists only since GCC 7.0. */
> +-# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) \
> +- || (defined __cplusplus && !__GNUC_PREREQ (13, 0)) \
> +- || __glibc_clang_prereq (3, 4)
> ++# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || (defined __cplusplus && !__GNUC_PREREQ (13,
> 0))
> + typedef __float128 _Float128;
> + # endif
> +
> +-/* __builtin_huge_valf128 doesn't exist before GCC 7.0 nor Clang 7.0. */
> +-# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) && !__glibc_clang_prereq (7, 0)
> ++/* __builtin_huge_valf128 doesn't exist before GCC 7.0. */
> ++# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
> + # define __builtin_huge_valf128() ((_Float128) __builtin_huge_val ())
> + # endif
> +
> +@@ -103,7 +96,7 @@ typedef __float128 _Float128;
> + Converting a narrower sNaN to _Float128 produces a quiet NaN, so
> + attempts to use _Float128 sNaNs will not work properly with older
> + compilers. */
> +-# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) && !defined __clang__
> ++# if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
> + # define __builtin_copysignf128 __builtin_copysignq
> + # define __builtin_fabsf128 __builtin_fabsq
> + # define __builtin_inff128() ((_Float128) __builtin_inf ())
> +@@ -114,8 +107,7 @@ typedef __float128 _Float128;
> + /* In math/math.h, __MATH_TG will expand signbit to __builtin_signbit*,
> + e.g.: __builtin_signbitf128, before GCC 6. However, there has never
> + been a __builtin_signbitf128 in GCC and the type-generic builtin is
> +- only available since GCC 6. signbit is expanded to __builtin_signbit
> +- after Clang 3.3. */
> ++ only available since GCC 6. */
> + # if !__GNUC_PREREQ (6, 0)
> + # define __builtin_signbitf128 __signbitf128
> + # endif
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb
> b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb
> index 7f2576692d6..70afc78a55c 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.41.bb
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc
> \
>
> file://0022-Avoid-hardcoded-build-time-paths-in-the-output-binar.patch \
>
> file://0023-tests-Skip-2-qemu-tests-that-can-hang-in-oe-selftest.patch \
>
> file://0024-features.h-Bump-__GLIBC_MINOR__-to-next-release-on-m.patch \
> +
> file://0001-Revert-x86-Define-__HAVE_FLOAT128-for-Clang-and-use-.patch \
> "
> S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> B = "${WORKDIR}/build-${TARGET_SYS}"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#209511):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/209511
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110491482/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
