See
https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?h=kirkstone&id=8a042b540db5421785edcf21d5114be6358246fd
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:53 AM Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > I copied vercmp_string_op() and all others called by it from
> bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py into a new python script.
>
> It's not an issue in vercmp_string_op itself, but the version value it
> gets from waf --version isn't just the version itself but also
> SyntaxWarning from waf.
>
> So you need to update waf in jack not to trigger SyntaxWarning when waf
> --version is called.
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 10:17 AM Zoltan Boszormenyi <zbos...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a FYI.
>>
>> After the bitbake-server getting stuck after bitbake exited
>> with Python 3.12 issue was fixed, here's another one.
>>
>> This time it's semi-reliably triggered by the jack recipe
>> in meta-openembedded:
>>
>> ERROR: jack-1.19.22-r0 do_configure: Error executing a python function in
>> exec_func_python() autogenerated:
>>
>> The stack trace of python calls that resulted in this exception/failure
>> was:
>> File: 'exec_func_python() autogenerated', lineno: 2, function: <module>
>> 0001:
>> *** 0002:waf_preconfigure(d)
>> 0003:
>> File:
>> '/home/zozo/test-yocto-4.3-gh/conf/../layers/openembedded-core/meta/classes-recipe/waf.bbclass',
>>
>> lineno: 58, function: waf_preconfigure
>> 0054: wafbin = os.path.join(subsrcdir, 'waf')
>> 0055: try:
>> 0056: result = subprocess.check_output([python, wafbin,
>> '--version'],
>> cwd=subsrcdir, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
>> 0057: version = result.decode('utf-8').split()[1]
>> *** 0058: if bb.utils.vercmp_string_op(version, "1.8.7", ">="):
>> 0059: d.setVar("WAF_EXTRA_CONF", "--bindir=${bindir}
>> --libdir=${libdir}")
>> 0060: except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
>> 0061: bb.warn("Unable to execute waf --version, exit code
>> %d. Assuming waf
>> version without bindir/libdir support." % e.returncode)
>> 0062: except FileNotFoundError:
>> File: '/home/zozo/test-yocto-4.3-gh/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py', lineno:
>> 150, function:
>> vercmp_string_op
>> 0146: Compare two versions and check if the specified comparison
>> operator matches
>> the result of the comparison.
>> 0147: This function is fairly liberal about what operators it
>> will accept since
>> there are a variety of styles
>> 0148: depending on the context.
>> 0149: """
>> *** 0150: res = vercmp_string(a, b)
>> 0151: if op in ('=', '=='):
>> 0152: return res == 0
>> 0153: elif op == '<=':
>> 0154: return res <= 0
>> File: '/home/zozo/test-yocto-4.3-gh/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py', lineno:
>> 140, function:
>> vercmp_string
>> 0136: return r
>> 0137:
>> 0138:def vercmp_string(a, b):
>> 0139: """ Split version strings and compare them """
>> *** 0140: ta = split_version(a)
>> 0141: tb = split_version(b)
>> 0142: return vercmp(ta, tb)
>> 0143:
>> 0144:def vercmp_string_op(a, b, op):
>> File: '/home/zozo/test-yocto-4.3-gh/bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py', lineno: 91,
>> function:
>> split_version
>> 0087: """Split a version string into its constituent parts (PE,
>> PV, PR)"""
>> 0088: s = s.strip(" <>=")
>> 0089: e = 0
>> 0090: if s.count(':'):
>> *** 0091: e = int(s.split(":")[0])
>> 0092: s = s.split(":")[1]
>> 0093: r = ""
>> 0094: if s.count('-'):
>> 0095: r = s.rsplit("-", 1)[1]
>> Exception: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10:
>> 'SyntaxWarning'
>>
>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>>
>> /home/zozo/test-yocto-4.3-gh/tmp-sicom-glibc/work/corei7-64-oe-linux/jack/1.19.22/temp/log.do_configure.1709417
>>
>> "Semi-reliably", i.e. about 50-50 or 60-40 percent failure vs success
>> rate.
>> Usually the second run succeeds after a failure.
>>
>> I copied vercmp_string_op() and all others called by it
>> from bitbake/lib/bb/utils.py into a new python script as a
>> minimum test case. Running this script inside a locally
>> cloned jack git repository has 100% success rate.
>>
>> It looks like an internal Python "flake" issue.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Zoltán Böszörményi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#194350):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/194350
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103973063/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
