On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 11:57 +0200, Piotr Łobacz wrote:
> Include support for ACLs and extended file attributes for native
> builds, depending on which distro target features has been turned
> on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Piotr Łobacz <p.lob...@welotec.com>
> ---
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index 9625a6fef4..da01e9b66f 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ IMAGE_FEATURES += "${EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES}"
>
> # Native distro features (will always be used for -native, even if they
> # are not enabled for target)
> -DISTRO_FEATURES_NATIVE ?= "x11 ipv6 xattr"
> +DISTRO_FEATURES_NATIVE ?= "x11 ipv6 ${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES',
> 'acl xattr', d)}"
> DISTRO_FEATURES_NATIVESDK ?= "x11"
>
> # Normally target distro features will not be applied to native builds:
Is there much benefit to making it depend on the target config?
I'm wondering if we should enable acl support in native distro tooling
unconditionally in the same way we already do for xattr? That should
just cause some minor build dependencies if I understand correctly?
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#184187):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/184187
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100054733/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
