On 02/27/2012 11:36 PM, James Limbouris wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Limbouris <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure_nm.patch           |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_2.24.0.bb |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure_nm.patch
> 
> diff --git 
> a/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure_nm.patch 
> b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure_nm.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1697967
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure_nm.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +At this stage of configure, ${NM} has already been correctly set.
> +This AC_PATH_PROG overwrites the correct path with a host path.
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [configuration]
> +Signed-off-by: James Limbouris <[email protected]>
> +
> +Index: gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure.ac
> +===================================================================
> +diff -uNr gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure.ac gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0.mod/configure.ac
> +--- gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0/configure.ac   2011-08-27 11:27:52.000000000 +0800
> ++++ gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0.mod/configure.ac       2012-02-28 14:48:36.481126410 
> +0800
> +@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@
> + AC_SYS_LARGEFILE
> + 
> + AM_PROG_AS
> +-AC_PATH_PROG(NM, nm, nm)

you could use AC_CHECK_TOOLS(NM, [$NM nm], nm)
here instead of deleting it

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to