On 19 Oct 2022, at 07:34, Khem Raj via lists.openembedded.org 
<raj.khem=gmail....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:42 PM Alexander Kanavin
> <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Can you show examples where this is needed? Custom variable does not seem a 
>> good idea. I also worry that it’ll break automated updates (it’s bad enough 
>> with mesa-gl, this might make it worse).
> 
> https://github.com/ndechesne/meta-qcom/blob/master/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa_git.bb

That is, well, horrible.

*If* we’re going to expose a mesa.inc that people outside of core can use to 
package up their own random Mesa SHA then mesa.inc should just be the packaging 
logic.

However, I don’t understand something about the patch.

Why do we only need to apply it on native builds?  It’s a backport from 
upstream, so should be the fix.  If it breaks when applied to target builds, is 
there a bug upstream for that? 

Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#171970): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/171970
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94420106/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to