On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:00 AM Peter Kjellerstedt
<peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org <openembedded-
> > c...@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield
> > Sent: den 6 oktober 2022 16:02
> > To: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com>
> > Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>; openembedded-
> > c...@lists.openembedded.org
> > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] perf: make scripting depend on
> > setuptools3
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 9:43 AM Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6 Oct 2022, at 14:29, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I'm not particularly concerned if the extra RDEPENDS arrives with
> > > > this, since if it is acceptable for other packages inheriting the
> > > > setuptools (I thought it was build support only!), it really should be
> > > > ok for perf as well. In particular since perf is debug/optional. Or am
> > > > I missing something there ?
> > >
> > > With this change the base perf package will always runtime-depend on
> > > python3, even if perf-python isn’t installed.  That sounds suboptimal.
> > >
> >
> > But is triggered on the 'scripting' packageconfig, which does mean we
> > want the support, so it is at least somewhat conditional .. but yes, I
> > agree that once we've built and packaged, it does make sense to keep
> > the python dependencies in the dedicated package.
> >
> > Let me re-work this and do the remove of the RDEPENDS and send a v2.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > > Ross
>
> To me it sounds as what setuptools3-base.bbclass really should to is
> something like:
>
> FOOBAR ??= "${PN}"
> RDEPENDS:${FOOBAR}:append:class-target = " ${PYTHON_PN}-core"
> ...
> FILES:${FOOBAR} += "${libdir}/* ${libdir}/${PYTHON_DIR}/*"
>
> so that the typical Python only recipes continue to just inherit
> setuptools3, but recipes that produce other packages than the
> Python package can do something like:
>
> FOOBAR = "${PYTHON_PN}-${PN}"
>
> Unfortunately this does not work as it results in a gazillion
> warnings like:
>
> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-support/libiio/libiio_git.bb: Variable key 
> FILES:${PN}-${PYTHON_PN} (${PYTHON_SITEPACKAGES_DIR}) replaces original key 
> FILES:libiio-python3 ( ${libdir}/* ${libdir}/${PYTHON_DIR}/*).
> WARNING: .../meta-oe/recipes-support/libiio/libiio_git.bb: Variable key 
> RDEPENDS:${PN}-${PYTHON_PN} (${PN} ${PYTHON_PN}-ctypes ${PYTHON_PN}-stringold 
> ${PYTHON_PN}-core) replaces original key RDEPENDS:libiio-python3 ( 
> ${PYTHON_PN}-core).
>
> (I chose libiio as it is an example of another recipes that currently
> does RDEPENDS:${PN}:remove = "${PYTHON_PN}-core" to counteract what
> setuptools3-base.bbclass does).
>

Ran into this today too. I think you dont need all the bells and
whistles of setuptools3 class. Adding

DEPENDS += "python3-setuptools-native"

should get the job done.

> :(
>
> //Peter
>
>
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#171590): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/171590
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94118767/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to