On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 22:52, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I'm still worried about bolting a format directly into one of our core > tools as it effectively means it is a definitive standard. We do > probably need one but I'm not convinced this is quite right, perhaps > because of the above reason. Not 100% sure but something doesn't feel > quite right. This part can perhaps be addressed by the venerable 'adding an abstraction layer', in the shape of config format generator plugins. I can supply the native json plugin, others can add kas, repo, or whatever else they find useful. Also, the json is versioned and almost nothing in it is required. If some ideas don't work out, or are found to cause problems, there are ways to transition out of problematic bits - perhaps even as simple as dropping the bad ideas from the generator, or the setup script, without modifying the schema. We do need a starting point though. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#169508): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169508 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/93080235/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
