On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 16:54 +0000, Bill Pittman wrote:
> If the custom kernel path is provided in options, then
> use that path instead of the default path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Pittman <bill.pitt...@ni.com>
> ---
> scripts/wic | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/wic b/scripts/wic
> index a741aed364..29a157bf37 100755
> --- a/scripts/wic
> +++ b/scripts/wic
> @@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ def wic_create_subcommand(options, usage_str):
> "(Use -e/--image-name to specify it)")
> native_sysroot = options.native_sysroot
>
> + if options.kernel_dir:
> + kernel_dir = options.kernel_dir
> +
> if not options.vars_dir and (not native_sysroot or not
> os.path.isdir(native_sysroot)):
> logger.info("Building wic-tools...\n")
> subprocess.check_call(["bitbake", "wic-tools"])
The concern with these kinds of changes is I can't really test it or tell if it
is the right thing to do and I worry about it regressing in the future.
Is there part of the test coverage we should be improving too? wic does have
fairly good coverage from oe-selftest -r wic
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#162628):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/162628
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89165206/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
