On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 15:07 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:52 PM Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 14:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Richard Purdie > > > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:45 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 20:05, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:20 AM Alexander Kanavin > > > > > > <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be the gtk-doc successor, and gnome > > > > > > > projects such as pango and gdk-pixbuf have started > > > > > > > transitioning to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > going through > > > > > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gi-docgen#disclaimer > > > > > > > > > > > > it seems that its still under development and not declared stable, > > > > > > so > > > > > > I am wary of the churn it will cause. > > > > > > I would prefer to wait until at least its declared prime time for > > > > > > system wide inclusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is only built if you enable api-documentation, and even then used > > > > > only > > > > > in pango and gdk-pixbuf. I'd say it's fairly well contained. > > > > > > > > I did also have a quick chat with friends in that community and their > > > > advice > > > > was that it was ok to switch now FWIW... > > > > > > ok, that helps, perhaps they can reflect this assertion in document above? > > > but still, depending upon abandoned packages needs to be answered by > > > upstream IMO before we tread down this path > > > > Reading that disclaimer, it seems to be saying they're making it work for > > gtk. > > We're using it in the gtk related components it is being developed for so > > I'm > > not sure there is an issue. What it says not to do is use it for general > > non-gtk > > code. We're not using it outside gtk? > > This above says > > GI-DocGen is still in development. The recommended use of GI-DocGen is > to add it as a sub-project to your Meson build system, and vendor it > when releasing dist archives. > > we are trying to use it in system mode and not vendored along with > packages which need it. Perhaps I am misunderstanding?
Effectively we are vendoring it since only things with a dependency on it will see it and we're only depending on it from things which it is intended for. It isn't like we're making it a system wide development tool. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#151365): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/151365 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82607077/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
