On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 14:28 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 20:45 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 20:05, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:20 AM Alexander Kanavin > > > > <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be the gtk-doc successor, and gnome > > > > > projects such as pango and gdk-pixbuf have started > > > > > transitioning to it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > going through > > > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gi-docgen#disclaimer > > > > > > > > it seems that its still under development and not declared stable, so > > > > I am wary of the churn it will cause. > > > > I would prefer to wait until at least its declared prime time for > > > > system wide inclusion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is only built if you enable api-documentation, and even then used only > > > in pango and gdk-pixbuf. I'd say it's fairly well contained. > > > > I did also have a quick chat with friends in that community and their advice > > was that it was ok to switch now FWIW... > > ok, that helps, perhaps they can reflect this assertion in document above? > but still, depending upon abandoned packages needs to be answered by > upstream IMO before we tread down this path
Reading that disclaimer, it seems to be saying they're making it work for gtk. We're using it in the gtk related components it is being developed for so I'm not sure there is an issue. What it says not to do is use it for general non-gtk code. We're not using it outside gtk? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#151360): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/151360 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82607077/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
