As discussed in the bugzilla entry, musl is not compatible with multilibs
and has no plans to support this. Therefore tell users this from the
recipe rather than letting them run into build failures.
[YOCTO #13122]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
index bdce412162c..f2f3d3d054b 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc
@@ -29,3 +29,9 @@ ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm"
B = "${WORKDIR}/build"
do_configure[cleandirs] = "${B}"
+
+python () {
+ multilibs = d.getVar("MULTILIBS")
+ if multilibs:
+ raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("musl is not compatible with multilibs")
+}
--
2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#137124):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137124
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72886268/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
