Op 1 dec. 2011, om 19:37 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: > > > On 01/12/11 09:26, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 1 dec. 2011, om 18:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: >> >>> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 16:57 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 14:51 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: >>>>> Thank you for the explanation. BTW where can I find official rules about >>>>> signed-off-by line >>>> >>>> The "Signed-off-by" idiom originated with the kernel people and >>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the linux source tree contains a >>>> fairly good description of what it means to them. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure that there are any official rules about its use in OE apart >>>> from what's in the Commit Patch Message Guidelines (see the wiki). >>> >>> The yocto docs do mention what the specific meaning of the line is. >> >> <pedantic mode>But this is oe-core.</pedantic mode>. Shall we all agree it's >> the same for OE-core as well? > > Isn't that the standard mode? ;-)
It actually is, glad someone noticed :) > I expect folks have the same understanding as stated in the kernel and > Yocto docs when using SOB - I see no reason for OE Core to introduce > ambiguity. > > Joshua > -- > Joshua Lock > Yocto Project "Johannes factotum" > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
