On 01/12/11 09:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 1 dec. 2011, om 18:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 16:57 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 14:51 -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>>> Thank you for the explanation. BTW where can I find official rules about
>>>> signed-off-by line
>>>
>>> The "Signed-off-by" idiom originated with the kernel people and
>>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the linux source tree contains a
>>> fairly good description of what it means to them.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that there are any official rules about its use in OE apart
>>> from what's in the Commit Patch Message Guidelines (see the wiki).
>>
>> The yocto docs do mention what the specific meaning of the line is.
>
> <pedantic mode>But this is oe-core.</pedantic mode>. Shall we all agree it's
> the same for OE-core as well?
Isn't that the standard mode? ;-)
I expect folks have the same understanding as stated in the kernel and
Yocto docs when using SOB - I see no reason for OE Core to introduce
ambiguity.
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
