On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 12:35 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:05 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> > On 10/4/2011 3:03 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: >> > > sysprof will not build properly without this defined >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock<m...@freescale.com> >> > > --- >> > > No comments on original patch sent >> > > >> > > meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb | 2 ++ >> > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > > b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > > index 10bde04..271b5d8 100644 >> > > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb >> > > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_arm = " file://rmb-arm.patch" >> > > SRC_URI_append_mips = " file://rmb-mips.patch" >> > > SRC_URI_append_powerpc = " file://ppc-macro-fix.patch" >> > > >> > > +export CFLAGS_append_powerpc64 = " -D__ppc64__" >> > > + >> > >> > this is a gcc built-in define I wonder why you need to add it explicitly >> >> Are you sure? Is the built-in define not __powerpc64__ ? > > Yes, __powerpc64__ is the generic one. I think __ppc64__ is only a > predefine on Darwin.
__powerpc64__ is not generic. Its Linux specific. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
