On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 12:35 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:05 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On 10/4/2011 3:03 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: > > > sysprof will not build properly without this defined > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock<m...@freescale.com> > > > --- > > > No comments on original patch sent > > > > > > meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb | 2 ++ > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb > > > b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb > > > index 10bde04..271b5d8 100644 > > > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/sysprof/sysprof_git.bb > > > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ SRC_URI_append_arm = " file://rmb-arm.patch" > > > SRC_URI_append_mips = " file://rmb-mips.patch" > > > SRC_URI_append_powerpc = " file://ppc-macro-fix.patch" > > > > > > +export CFLAGS_append_powerpc64 = " -D__ppc64__" > > > + > > > > this is a gcc built-in define I wonder why you need to add it explicitly > > Are you sure? Is the built-in define not __powerpc64__ ?
Yes, __powerpc64__ is the generic one. I think __ppc64__ is only a predefine on Darwin. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
