On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 08:08 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thursday, August 04, 2011 02:52:22 PM Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:56 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > # links
> > > ac_cv_lib_png_png_create_info_struct=${ac_cv_lib_png_png_create_info_s
> > > truct=yes}>
> > > -# mono
> > > -cv_mono_sizeof_sunpath=108
> > > -
> > >
> > Isn't mono different from monotone?
>
> yes its for mono. I think we should keep it since there are many users of mono
> from oe.dev world who would want mono in future may be from future meta-mono
>
Why couldn't the site entry just go in meta-mono too, if that's where
the recipes are living? I don't think it makes much/any sense (for
testability reasons as much as anything else) to have a load of siteinfo
entries lying around that no oe-core recipe actually uses.
p.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
