On Saturday, July 30, 2011 07:39:47 PM Phil Blundell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 10:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 03:56:45 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > We were just setting this to the assumed default. If anything, this > > > belongs in the libc files if we must set it. > > > > uid_t is not a libc controlled define. Its kernel controlled (though > > kernel- headers) > > No, that's incorrect. The uid_t that applications see is controlled by > libc and decoupled from __kernel_uid_t. There is logic in glibc to > convert between types if necessary.
uclibc passes on whatever kernel defines it to. rethinking, probably libc is ok for it. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Khem Raj _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
